|
In his ERExchange.com article, "How
to Build a Compelling Employer Brand, Part 1"
(2-20-03), David Lee, President of HumanNature@Work,
an HR consulting and training firm in
Bar Mills, ME, urges employers to create a "...branded
work experience that establishes [the firm] as an
employer of choice."
Similarly, he observes, "Companies known for providing
unique, stand-out customer service ... differentiate
themselves in the marketplace with ... a 'branded
customer experience.'"
Makes eminent sense. Unfortunately, however, too often
there exists a disconnection between the branded work
or customer experience and what we might call "the
branded job applicant experience."
For evidence of this problem, look no further than
the career websites of the esteemed Fortune 500 largest
U.S. public companies. Sadly, the careers section
of the corporate websites of fewer than 18% of these
household-name firms merit "best practice"
status, down from 22% a year earlier.
This finding is part of study conducted recently by
MMC Group, Inc., an e-staffing practice based in Kendall
Park, NJ, and publisher of CareerXroads, a leading
directory of the web's best recruiting sites. Worse
yet, according to co-author Gerry Crispin, more than
5% of F500 companies make no mention at all of jobs/employment/careers
anywhere online.
Or consider the case of John D, whose job search includes
using one of the major online job boards to identify
openings. His search returns, among other openings,
three from companies A, B, and C, which are well known
for their positive public images. Company B, in fact,
employs his cousin, who loves working there.
This looks good, John says to himself. He applies online
for all three jobs, dutifully researching each company
and spending non-trivial time tailoring his resume
and cover letter to each position.
What happens next characterizes the experiences of
an overwhelming majority of job seekers who conduct
job searches online. From Company A John receives
a brief but cordial standardized e-mail acknowledging
receipt of his application and letting him know his
resume is being evaluated. Company B responds similarly
but less cordially, indicating little more than the
applicant tracking number he's been assigned. From
Company C he hears nothing.
Hmm, John thinks, something doesn't tally here. These
companies repeatedly win public accolades for their
customer and community service and employee satisfaction.
Yet they seem to be treating me as little more than
a number, if not a nuisance.
Confused and disillusioned, logic leads John to question
these companies' brands, whose credibility they work
diligently and at great expense to create and sustain
among customers and employees. And based on his personal
experience as a job seeker, it's not a stretch to
believe he'd question the trust these firms merit
as current or potential suppliers of goods and services
to him and, through word-of-mouth, his considerable
circle of family, friends and colleagues.
According to Jo Bredwell, Senior Partner with JWT Specialized
Communications, a unit of J. Walter Thompson, in New
York City, "Employer branding is the process
of discovery, analysis, definition and communication
of an organization's unique assets. The brand message
must reflect the reality of the organization and be
recognizable and believable for the people it touches."
To be fully aligned with the brand, she adds, "All
recruitment and employment systems and procedures
must be reviewed and revised to reflect best practice
standards. Every message to the external candidate
audience is intended to convey the essence of the
brand. Bringing the brand to life is about 'walking
the talk' and making sure that everything about the
employment experience is true to your brand."
Remember John D? Think the brand managers at Companies
A, B and C would be pleased to see how poorly the
firms' recruiters are treating the corporate image
they so vigorously try to protect?
Or consider the real-life scenario of a highly respected
audio technology provider. Known widely for innovation
and quality, the company also is known for regularly
posting ghost jobs on the major job boards
jobs that don't exist but for the purpose of collecting
resumes for some future job openings. Though not uncommon,
the practice nevertheless can tarnish this otherwise
stellar brand by discouraging top candidates from
applying.
OK, OK, you might say. So we'll beef up our candidate
response system and make the e-mail sound more personal.
And we'll stop posting ghost jobs for a while. That
should satisfy the brand police.
Perhaps, but is the minimum an acceptable standard
of professionalism for your recruiting staff as ambassadors
of the company brand? particularly as the labor
market turns more challenging?
The 'Wow' Candidate Experience
What would it take for your company to provide job
seekers a truly outstanding job search experience?
an experience that would deliver value to applicants
and distinguish you as an employer in touch with the
needs and aspirations of individual candidates
one that would enable HR to demonstrate its positive
contribution to the company brand in new and innovative
ways.
What if
What if the very act of applying for a job could include
steps that give applicants an accurate view of themselves
relative to others in the mix?
What if this process led applicants to act with greater
confidence either in pursuit of an ideal job,
or by moving on to jobs that better match their skills
and experience?
What if you enabled applicants to know quickly and
effectively whether they are under- or overqualified
for the position?
What if your recruiting system provided cues that enable
highly qualified candidates to pursue well-fitting
jobs with gusto, and avoid spinning their wheels on
jobs for which they are less well suited?
What if there were a process for qualified candidates
to express to you their motivation, interest and competitive
drive?
What if candidates had the flexibility to submit their
resumes in the format they prefer, such as Word, PDF
or RTF, thereby preserving the layout and fonts they
believe best represent themselves?
What if there were an automated response system that
both acknowledges the individual's application and,
once the job is filled, informs all candidates of
same, as well as the source of the successful candidate,
such as job board or internal hire?
What if there were ways to interface conveniently with
applicants through the recruiting system itself, rather
than through a separate e-mail system, and to track
all applicant correspondence, both yours and your
colleagues'?
With the Interview Exchange, what-if's like these come
to life in a single, low-cost, high-value online recruiting
package.
Typically, 80-90% of job applicants don't meet the
job requirements included in the job description posted
on job boards, print ads and other job advertising
media. We know of one employer who stated very specifically
in the job ad that the successful candidate must possess
an engineering Ph.D. and university teaching experience.
So he scratches his head when hundreds of resumes
flood his desktop from applicants who fall far short
of these basic requirements.
Yet he has little recourse but to sort manually through
hundreds of useless resumes to find the needles in
the haystack of applicants. Had our overworked recruiter
used the patent-pending Interview Exchange applicant
qualifying tools, he could have automatically identified
the relatively few applicants who meet the requirements.
Perhaps more important for promoting your brand, however,
powerful yet easy-to-use features of the Interview
Exchange dramatically expand the definition of the
job search for applicants. For example:
- A simple online questionnaire, which focuses on
must-have and nice-to-have qualifications, lets
applicants see how well they fit the ideal candidate
profile. By knowing immediately the "price
of admission" to the short list of qualified
applicants, most unqualified job seekers simply
refrain from applying, rather than spinning their
wheels pursing long-odds positions.
- An ingenious tool, the PublicProfile, lets
applicants actually compare their skills and experience
with others vying for the job, anonymously and
cost-free, of course. With the job market insight
this unique tool provides them, applicants are
better equipped to make informed, confident judgments
about where they fit.
- Highly qualified applicants can go even further
in attracting the attention of the employer. By
using our free CareerPoints "bidding"
feature, applicants can demonstrate their motivation
to be hired. In this virtual auction setting,
candidates can bid free CareerPoints based on
their sense of hireability, self-confidence and
job fit gained from their completion of the earlier
steps in the Interview Exchange system.
To accommodate the dynamic nature of your hiring needs,
you can use one, two or all three Interview Exchange
screening tools for any job, all for a single low
price.
Further, our tools enable fast, direct communication
between you and candidates, through a simplified online
bulletin board interface. You can personalize candidate
communication in other useful ways as well, such as
keeping them informed of their status and notifying
them when the job is filled and from what source.
Unlike virtually any other offering of its kind, the
Interview Exchange delivers tangible value to job
seekers value that can go a long way toward
reinforcing your employer brand, and making you a
more effective ambassador of the essence of that precious
asset.
Contact David Lee at dal@sacoriver.net,
Gerry Crispin at mmc@careerxroads.com,
and Jo Bredwell at jo.bredwell@jwt.com.
|